AI crawlers allowed
20/20 pts
robots.txt allows GPTBot, ChatGPT-User, anthropic-ai, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, and Google-Extended.
AI Readiness Report
How visible adobe.com is to AI engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Claude, based on a technical scan of crawler access, structured data, and citation signals.
Summary
adobe.com has an AI Readiness score of 60/100, placing it at Maturity Level 3: Retrievable. The site was scanned on April 27, 2026 across 7 technical signals that influence whether AI engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Claude can discover, parse, and cite content from adobe.com.
Maturity Level 3
Based on 60 out of 100 points across 7 technical signals that influence whether AI engines can discover, parse, and cite adobe.com.
Content-level signals were checked on: https://www.adobe.com/id_en/products/catalog.html
20/20 pts
robots.txt allows GPTBot, ChatGPT-User, anthropic-ai, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, and Google-Extended.
10/10 pts
A valid /llms.txt file is served at the root.
0/15 pts
Homepage lacks JSON-LD Organization markup. AI engines cannot identify the entity behind the site.
Fix: Add JSON-LD Organization with name, url, logo, and sameAs links to social profiles.
0/15 pts
Content pages lack JSON-LD Article markup. AI engines may struggle to attribute and quote the content.
Fix: Add JSON-LD Article with headline, datePublished, author, and publisher to blog/article templates.
15/15 pts
JSON-LD FAQPage markup found.
0/10 pts
Content pages have no Person schema with a verifiable identity (sameAs link or author bio URL).
Fix: Add JSON-LD Person to article authors with sameAs link to LinkedIn or other verifiable profile.
15/15 pts
A Sitemap: directive in robots.txt points to the sitemap.xml file.
The score above measures technical readiness. The next step is measuring whether ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Claude currently mention adobe.com for the queries that matter. The free AI Visibility Audit runs live queries against the engines and reports back.
Run free AI Visibility Audit →Re-scan adobe.com →
Run a fresh AI Readiness scan now.
Maturity model →
The 5-level framework behind this score.
2026 report →
How adobe.com compares to the top 500.
adobe.com scored 60 out of 100 on the Appearly AI Readiness scan, placing it at Maturity Level 3 (Retrievable).
Yes. robots.txt allows GPTBot, ChatGPT-User, anthropic-ai, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, and Google-Extended.
Yes. A valid /llms.txt file is served at the root.
No. Homepage lacks JSON-LD Organization markup. AI engines cannot identify the entity behind the site. Add JSON-LD Organization with name, url, logo, and sameAs links to social profiles.
No. Content pages lack JSON-LD Article markup. AI engines may struggle to attribute and quote the content. Add JSON-LD Article with headline, datePublished, author, and publisher to blog/article templates.
Yes. JSON-LD FAQPage markup found.
No. Content pages have no Person schema with a verifiable identity (sameAs link or author bio URL). Add JSON-LD Person to article authors with sameAs link to LinkedIn or other verifiable profile.
Yes. A Sitemap: directive in robots.txt points to the sitemap.xml file.
Appearly scans up to 8 pages per domain (homepage, robots.txt, /llms.txt, sitemap, and a discovered content page) to evaluate 7 signals weighted from 10 to 20 points each. The maturity model maps total score to one of 5 levels: Invisible (0), Discoverable (1), Indexable (2), Retrievable (3), Cited (4).
Sources and references:
Published: · Last updated: · Publisher: Appearly (AI Visibility Platform)